Define the exposure
Identify who bears the loss: a habitat bank, developer, unit buyer, lender, grower or food company.
BIODIVERSITY-LINKED INSURANCE
KEA works with insurance and distribution partners to turn biodiversity exposure into well-defined product concepts, combining ecological product design, nature data and field evidence.
Initial focus: Biodiversity Net Gain · Nature-dependent agriculture
Bring us a live riskHabitat bank / Site A
Observations inform review. Coverage follows policy terms.
THE PRODUCT OPPORTUNITY
A biodiversity indicator becomes useful to insurance when it connects to an insured interest, a defined loss and evidence that holds up over time. That is the design work we take on with your team.
Identify who bears the loss: a habitat bank, developer, unit buyer, lender, grower or food company.
Build the baseline and monitoring plan around habitat condition, ecological function and the interest being protected.
Compare indemnity, parametric and hybrid structures after assessing data quality, loss correlation and basis risk.
TWO PRODUCT PATHWAYS
BNG offers defined obligations and an emerging insurance precedent. Agriculture offers established insurance channels, with an ecological link to production loss that must first be tested.
01 / ENGLAND · BIODIVERSITY NET GAIN
Habitat banks and their counterparties commit to ecological outcomes long after a unit is sold. Defined events such as fire or flood can disrupt that trajectory. A product can be designed to fund recovery and address specific contractual shortfalls.
Habitat bank operators, landowners, developers, unit buyers and capital providers.
Cover concepts to explore
Recovery costs following defined insured events.
Replacement costs where an insured failure creates a contractual unit shortfall.
Pre-inception habitat baseline, condition trajectory, evidence of disturbance, damage assessment and recovery monitoring. BNG calculations use the statutory habitat metric with competent ecological assessment.
One habitat bank or portfolio, one defined obligation and an agreed set of hazards, with baseline data to assess coverage and pricing.
02 / NATURE-DEPENDENT AGRICULTURE
Pollination and habitat condition can matter to crop performance. We test whether those ecological signals can improve the understanding and coverage of production losses alongside weather, management and yield data.
Growers, agribusinesses, cooperatives and food companies exposed to ecosystem-service disruption.
Cover concepts to explore
A potential response to a validated ecological disruption.
Intervention costs following a defined covered event.
Crop-specific pollinator and habitat monitoring integrated with production, weather and management records. Sampling accounts for seasonality, observation effort and uncertainty.
One crop and landscape with historical production data, a credible loss hypothesis and partners able to evaluate alternative insurance structures.
THE EVIDENCE SYSTEM
Connect the baseline, observations and scientific review to the insurance decision each is intended to support.
Habitat bank / Site A
Observations inform review. Coverage follows policy terms.
Map habitat parcels, document the baseline and agree the methods and review schedule. Keep the ecological target and evidence gaps visible before coverage is considered.
THE WORKING GROUP
Build around one commercial problem, with responsibilities agreed from the start.
Define the ecological exposure, measurement protocol and data specification. Coordinate field evidence and test indicators with the insurance team.
Set risk appetite, actuarial analysis, capacity, pricing, coverage design and policy wording.
Lead client discovery, insurance programme structuring, placement and distribution. Bring market feedback and a route to a live pilot.
HOW WE WORK TOGETHER
A focused design sprint brings the client problem, the insurance structure and the nature evidence into one pilot plan.
Select the insured interest, financial exposure and a live pilot candidate.
Review available data, loss history, measurement consistency and basis risk.
Define candidate coverage structures and the monitoring specification with partners.
Leave with a product brief, open questions and clear criteria for progressing to a pilot.
KEA provides ecological product design, nature data and field evidence. We help define what to measure and how that evidence connects to a proposed product. Insurance partners determine and provide the insurance terms and capacity.
Potentially. We assess repeatability, historical depth, independence, loss correlation and basis risk with the insurer before proposing any trigger. An ecological observation alone does not establish an insurable financial loss.
We design monitoring around the obligation and applicable habitat metric. Policy duration, renewal terms and continuity of cover are separate contractual questions; annual measurement does not guarantee future cover.
KEA’s field network started in Latin America. UK and other engagements are scoped with the relevant local specialists, data access and field capacity confirmed for each pilot.
Product concepts are for co-development and feasibility assessment. Insurance capacity, underwriting, policy wording and placement are provided by appropriately authorised partners; coverage is subject to final policy terms.
THE EVIDENCE SYSTEM
Keep the financial exposure, ecological observations and review decisions connected as the product develops.

KEA NETWORK
A curated network of ecologists and field specialists connects geospatial analysis with targeted surveys, eDNA, bioacoustics, camera traps and other methods where appropriate.
Select methods for the habitat, crop and decision. Local capability, sampling frequency, data rights and independent review are agreed in the pilot scope.
Let’s define the risk, test the evidence and design the next step together.